Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Hotel room porn

7 views
Skip to first unread message

Lucky Otter

unread,
Feb 5, 2001, 9:03:19 PM2/5/01
to
Hi Ramers

I recently spent a couple of nights in the Dallas Hyatt. Dallas
being the town it is, there wasn't much to do other than
sit in my room and watch the porno channel. It was one
of those on-demand $15 all-u-can-view sort of deals.

However, I noticed that (a) all the anal action had been
edited out (even from an anal themed movie, something
like "Rear entry-in thru the out passage") and (b) there
were no cumshots, just lame "ecstacy faces".

Has anyone else seen such watered-down porn? I was
a little dissapointed, to say the least.

Cheers

Lucky
---------------------------------------------------------------------
** rec.arts.movies.erotica FAQ at http://www.rame.net/faq **
** internet adult film database at http://www.iafd.com **

gonzo-leaser rice

unread,
Feb 6, 2001, 3:01:54 AM2/6/01
to
FWIW, the best (ie uncut) in-house porn I've seen is in New Zealand of
all places! The Kiwis offer both sr8 n' gay channels in the The
Carlton, Auckland (a Five star joint) my programme featured a jiucy
Rosebud offering featuring a young Mimi Myagi! Germany is hard core
too, but the hotel porn there can be very ho-hum, in spite of the props
rightly given to sites such as Puakavision.com and hvwmedia.com.
I've heard some parts of Canada deliver too.
Japan is a frustration with both local and US porn pixillated all to
fuck (why bother!)
that's all I know...

> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> ** rec.arts.movies.erotica FAQ at http://www.rame.net/faq **
> ** internet adult film database at http://www.iafd.com **
>
>

--
No matter how good she looks, some other guy is sick and tired of
putting up with her shit.
-- Graffiti in Men's Room, Linda's Bar and Grill, Chapel Hill, NC


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/

Eric Dew

unread,
Feb 7, 2001, 6:21:47 PM2/7/01
to
In article <rame.981541205p31956@bash>,
TomMix <Tom...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>I stayed in a Holiday Inn in Texas about six months ago. I looked at
>the porn channel just to see what it was like in the bible-belt. I
>think the film was a censored hardcore flick with some of the action
>put back in to keep you from being completely bored. They also cut-out
>the cum-shot.
>
>I wonder who decides what gets cut and what doesn't and what the
>reasoning is.

Wonder who'd like to have that job, eh?

Seriously, I think the editing is done at the production level (i.e.,
the hotel chain doesn't do the editing, nor the local government).

The hotel probably offers a guideline to the producers saying, we
want such and such, and you can't show this and that.

The director will then tape different cuts using different camera angles,
some with a bit more show, some at a more confined angle.

The editor will also add, remove, or replace shots or scenes so that
it's digestable to the hotel chain. They might preview the result
to the hotel chain and the chain will either buy it or make recommendations
for additional cuts (dt they would ask to include things, unless
they've seen the more graphic version, since it's impossible for
someone to ask for something they don't know whether it exists or
not).

So the decision to cut is made by the director and editor, with guidelines
provided by the producers and buyers.

That's my guess. How'd I do?

EDEW

d

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 3:19:30 PM2/11/01
to
Methinks Eric Dew is correct in that this type of porn is not censored at
the local level. I think it is probably censored by mutual agreement
between the producers and korporate amerika.

Being from Texas, I don't spend a lot of time in hotels here, but I have
viewed crappy hotel porn in NJ & FLA and it sounds the same as the Dallas
porn you witnessed.

BTW, I grant you that Dallas isnt that cool of a town, but you're pretty
lame if you couldn't find something to do there. What do you expect?
New Orleans during Mardi Gras?

NoseMan

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 4:35:03 PM2/11/01
to
I viewed a hotel-room porn with Steve StCroix stroking his dick, with
his hand and dick covered by his shirt. This is absurd. Do they
really think there is anyone who would be shocked/offended by seeing
the actual dick-in-hand, who would not also be shocked/offended by the
scene as shown? What a bunch of Puritan assholes we Americans are!

cerf...@webtv.net

unread,
Feb 11, 2001, 8:56:42 PM2/11/01
to
What I find hilarious about the hotel porn I've seen in the US is the
visuals weren't edited but as soon as the sex scenes started you didn't
hear any "natural" sounds/audio but some background music. Guess that
way the "neighbors" wouldn't be disturbed by the moaning and dirty talk.
Oddly enough in all the hotels I've been in I've heard more interesting
live moans/squeeks/creaks through the walls than these hotel videos had
in them!
Cerf

Eric Dew

unread,
Feb 12, 2001, 9:39:01 PM2/12/01
to
In article <rame.981936009p30309@bash>, <cerf...@webtv.net> wrote:
>What I find hilarious about the hotel porn I've seen in the US is the
>visuals weren't edited but as soon as the sex scenes started you didn't
>hear any "natural" sounds/audio but some background music. Guess that
>way the "neighbors" wouldn't be disturbed by the moaning and dirty talk.
>Oddly enough in all the hotels I've been in I've heard more interesting
>live moans/squeeks/creaks through the walls than these hotel videos had
>in them!
>Cerf

My SO and I watched a hotel porn once. I swear, there's more skin and
heat in five minutes of almost any day-time soap opera than what we
saw for the whole 30+ minutes (until we gave it up and decided we
"got our money's worth -- you know you pay a flat fee for it, so you
might as well watch as much as you can before you turn it off in
disgust because the depictions are so friggin' lame).

EDEW

0 new messages